Fascinated by the story, I saw that the book had originally been written by Michael Crichton. The list of other movies based on his books was incredible. I’d seen several, all thrilling adventure movies with real intriguing plots at the same time. His imagination lived on the edge of reality, whether it was science fiction or fantasy or the cutting edge of technology. Included in his list are: Jurassic Park, Timeline, Congo, and Twister. He also writes for the TV show ER, though I never watched that.
Then I began to notice that his older books are frequently found on used bookstore shelves for very good prices. I bought a few. The first one I began had a horrible opening scene, quite inappropriate in content and language. Maybe I shouldn’t have spent money on them. I put that one well away.
A few months later I read that Frank Peretti’s favorite contemporary author is Michael Crichton. If Frank Peretti likes him, all his books can’t be like that. And who ever heard of movies cutting the content or language? Rather the contrary. But I’d seen several movies that were mostly just intense. One of the books I own is Timeline itself, a beat up mass paperback edition. I’ve read the first few pages.
Generally speaking, I’m having a hard time justifying novels since graduating high school. In high school there was all this mandatory non-fiction reading and literature (sometimes really boring literature), so I occasionally needed an easy-read novel to lighten things up. Now I read entirely what I want. So usually I might as well read something new, edifying, and educational. In fact I am a much bigger fan of history now that I’m reading books focused on a few years, decades, or centuries rather than the history of the whole world.
But I was cleaning my room a couple days ago, reorganizing some of my books again (I’d used their container as decoration for a Pigfest), when I came across one of Michael Crichton’s books, Sphere. The front cover featured divers swimming around several underwater spheres, and boasted an upcoming motion picture (which is decades old now, and I’ll guarantee you without even checking that it was rated R). The scene on the cover never happens, and totally misconstrues the title. The back was more accurate, indicating some sort of alien novel. I opened to the first page.
Not bad. I set it aside. Now last week I finished the book about Iceland. I had a million things to do, and no free time. So the beginning of this week was spent in rebellion against responsibility and hard work. I’m getting over it. During the hours in which I finally had nothing scheduled, I curled up with Sphere.
To my delight, part of the plot actually does deal with time travel (and I’m such a fan of time travel!). Basically a half-mile long spacecraft is found at the bottom of a shallower part of the Pacific Ocean. Based on the coral growth, scientists estimate that the ship has been submerged for three hundred years. But it isn’t rusted, or even damaged as if from a crash. The conclusion is that it must have materialized there after voyaging through time. A team of US Navy and US scientists is assembled to investigate the Anomaly.
Throughout the book Michael Crichton deals with the question of intelligence, especially contrasted with soul and emotion. The end of the book reveals the paradoxical union of these, and the consequences of neglecting one over the other. Even the individuals on the team represent different aspects of humanity, with our desires and interests, strengths and weaknesses. As sort of a subconscious defense against being too involved in the story, I enjoyed observing what the author was getting at. I observed his craft and motivation as though he was one of the characters. That is the best way to solve mysteries before the author tells you, to collect the clues and notice the connections. Except I lost. I didn’t realize. Oh well.
The book spends a fair amount of time talking about evolution, both biological and intellectual. When discussing the possibility of alien life and the probabilities of its attributes, this is bound to come up. Whence comes life? Why is life the way it is? Can something be alive and not have a body, or not have DNA, or not have emotion? Might there be life that is indestructible? What if it’s thought and communication systems are completely foreign? What if the alien life is intelligent, but evolved mental science rather than physical? They could be blobs that don’t have to sculpt a sculpture; it just is how they think it to be.
Several difficulties with evolution are also mentioned, but skimmed over. I thought it was interesting that the biologists were attributed with the theory that alien life is unlikely, while physicists and cosmologists believe it is likely. The answer Michael Crichton gives is that the physicists and cosmologists imagine a bigger world than what they see. They imagine other dimensions, possibly even other universes. In the twenty years since Sphere was written, a shift has taken place. The sciences heavily dependent on math and probability boast fewer believers in alien life. Biologists are almost desperate to find alien life for two reasons: it would indicate an as yet undiscovered law by which life is more likely to evolve (something to add to chance and natural selection) or it would grant more validity to the increasingly popular theory that since we don’t have any evidence (or enough time) for life evolving here on planet earth, perhaps life was planted here by aliens who evolved a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away where they keep all the evidence.
As to whether I can recommend this book, I’d have to say no. There are some strong content issues in just a few places, some crass language and a lot of mild profanity and a profusion of using God’s name as a curse word. Additionally there is a lot of violence and “disturbing images” – more disturbing when I read because generally I don’t close my eyes for parts that get too scary while I’m reading. At one point I remember thinking, “Wow. I get to see a giant squid. Jules Verne only wrote about one, and the movie versions, they’re all fake… Wait a second!”
Ok, so if you are going to take my recommendation and not read the book, but you’re interested in the conclusions of the ideas presented, highlight the invisible text below:
In the spaceship, by one member’s impulsiveness, they discover some pretty advanced technology, crafted by Americans fifty years in the future. A lot is made of the fact that even our technology today would seem like magic if we brought it back a hundred years or more to brilliant scientists on whose work our technology was built. They’d have to be caught up on our advances in physics and such to even begin to comprehend.
The team learns from the cooperative computers on the ship that the voyage was made to enter a black hole just beyond Pluto, which induced time travel. Black hole theory is explained in layman’s terms using a bowl, and apple, and a ball bearing.
Along the way the spacecraft seems to have picked up an intelligently-designed object, a 30-ft. sphere with “cabular grooves,” which end up concealing a door they can’t open.
Eventually the door is opened without any apparent reason. The smartest man on the team, and youngest scientist, a mathematician, figures out how to get into the sphere, and spends three hours inside, after which he will explain nothing of his knowledge or experience. He is simply exhausted.
Soon after they start experiencing strange phenomenon, like the discovery of three unidentified species of sea life in an area that had been barren of life on the sea floor. They lose a member of their team to jelly fish. And things get worse from there. A giant squid comes around, claiming the lives of most of the team. Those who are left are a mathematician, a biologist, and the psychologist. (mind, body, soul)
In the meantime, the sphere has made contact, projecting first number codes, then letters and words and sentences onto their computer screen. He says his name is Jerry. He can hear them, enjoys talking to them, and doesn’t understand questions about where he came from. They gather as events pass that he is the cause of the “manifestations,” including the giant squid. He wants to talk, and when they wish to talk privately, he gets angry. He turns hostile through the giant squid, which attacks the habitat and individuals, even luring one person with a sign of attention and intelligent playfulness. His hostility grows to the point where he says “I will kill you all.” Not a comforting thought when dealing with an all powerful unknown being. But are they?
What eventually works for the team is the instructions of one of the psychologist’s professors. Don’t try to understand everything. Do something. If that doesn’t work, do something else, no matter how crazy. It’s a pretty good way to quickly tackle the unknown. Especially when this line of reasoning reveals that rather than dealing with an alien entity that doesn’t understand what he’s doing, they’re really suffering the effects of the sphere, which enables those who enter it to manifest whatever they imagine, to manipulate reality. This was the union of thought and emotion: imagination.
The first to discover this was the underappreciated super-genius, who felt lonely his whole life, and restrained from demonstrating his full genius. But he was a man despairingly afraid, and his fears came to life. (In fact his logical brain reasoned that since there was no reference on the spacecraft to the discoverers of the technology in the past – the team discovering it now – that the team must all die in the ordeal, before ever revealing anything about the spacecraft to the world.) The second person to (secretly) enter the sphere was the concrete biologist, who required constant reassurance, connection, and control. She imagined offenses and constantly considered herself the victim. She turns out to be semi-suicidal and bent on self-torture. Finally the psychologist himself enters the sphere and has a mental conversation with his dark side. His weakness is to discredit the importance of logic, to rely on feelings. His survival means more to him than almost anything. Ultimately, though, it is his beliefs that save them all. He believes humans are worth helping. Emotions can be controlled and are worth controlling. He had been the one saying “Stick together,” and so he could not desert.
Was the sphere some cosmic test? Was the sphere itself a form of life? Did an alien (or future human) intelligence want to know how a human would react to getting whatever he wanted? Is that what imagination is for? How powerful is the imagination? Maybe the sphere accidentally had that effect. Maybe its intentions had nothing to do with humanity.
In the end the three survivors (mortal enemies mere hours before) cooperatively and unanimously decide to imagine the sphere and their past week’s experience out of existence. They come up with a new story to imagine in its place, and so it is done. The world ends up having no knowledge of time travel until they boldly voyage for the black hole fifty years in the future.
PS: I looked up Sphere on the internet. Lo and behold it did cut content from the book, and ended up with a PG-13 rating.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
Amy of Humble Musing fame linked an article about imagination which brought up a good point. Whereas my analysis of Sphere concluded that mind, body, and soul are unified in imagination, this author said that imagination informs the mind, body, and soul. What we imagine affects what we feel and challenges what we know and believe. So that article advocates guarding your imagination – but also training it with stories that uphold truth and morality.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
You wouldn’t recommend it because of mild (very, very, very, mild) profanity and violence? Because it uses god’s name as a curse word? You have truly sheltered yourself from just about all of the greatest books ever written (not saying this book is).
Ignorant
Johnny,
There is additional content involving the woman. (Forgot her name already.) And some crass comments based on the feministic rivalry.
So yeah, I’m pretty sheltered. It’s pretty amazing that I read this book.
But I have friends who read this blog who are more conservative than me, and younger, and I don’t want to offend or mislead them by recommending a book with such content.
As far as greatest books ever written, I’m generally content with the reading I have experienced.
Curse words are poor grammar, and lazy. Authors and speakers who must resort to profanity in order to communicate an emotion are to be pitied. I would rather enjoy and endorse those who have taken the time to actually give me an idea of their feelings and motivations, respecting the true meanings of words taken as profanity by only using them in literal contexts.
And I would rather use my time to fill my mind with things that are full of truth and purity, and will help me to be more true, more pure, and more like Jesus Christ. It is a little weird, but that’s a pretty big goal of my life, so I’m making choices accordingly.
My life verse is Romans 12:(1 and) 2 – “And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.”
Thank you for your comment and interaction with my blog. I am almost always encouraged to receive any sort of response. Yours was welcome.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
Seriously, it was a great book. You are way too sensitive. Grow up.
Stop being so critical and enjoy the [removed by Lady of Longbourn] book. That’s what it’s for, is it not?
So to all of you who find my review overly critical:
I reread my post. Most of it is very positive. I enjoyed the themes of the book.
However…
The target audience of this blog contains conservative Christians and younger people for whom R or even PG-13 rated books and movies would be considered inappropriate. When I review a book, I can’t just put all the positives and sound like I’m endorsing all the content. So fair warning, there is bad language in this book, as well as anti-God material and immorality. If I’d known all that was in the book, I would have chosen more edifying reading material and gone without the story of Sphere, however interesting or entertaining.
Though a book might be for enjoyment, I as a person was not created merely to enjoy, but to be someone: strong, good, creative, kind. As a Christian I am created to be someone who is pure and separate from the world, who encourages people and loves the truth. Those are the things I try to uphold on this blog.
All those things said, I think my review was heavy on the side of the interesting points and philosophies of the book – and comments telling me to “grow up” are being unfair. (Why is it grown up to tolerate vulgarity and immorality?) I would request that any comments made here reflect the intentions and priorities of my blog. They should be kind, not rude, and necessary or productive. I don’t mind being criticized as long as I am criticized on truth and good values. If you disagree with me for other reasons, no one is forcing you to read my blog.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
Lisa,
I can understand how you would not recommend this book to the littl’uns because of the content. However, I am a little disappointed to read:
“If I’d known all that was in the book, I would have chosen more edifying reading material and gone without the story of Sphere, however interesting or entertaining.”
I know that Christianity condemns many of the characters’ actions, however, you have to remember that books are not always going to be made about conservative Christians. Contemporary literature must coexist with its time period in all aspects. The world is not filled with conservative Christians. Similarly, contemporary literature is not either. Quite frankly, I believe casting the world’s leading scientists as pleasant, Godly individuals would be rather inaccurate and detract from the story. It’s well known that the vast majority of mathematicians and scientists are atheist or agnostic.
This book does not specifically condone or encourage any particular behavior. It simply has characters that act according to their descriptions. Therefore, I don’t believe that you would be endorsing that behavior by proxy if you chose to recommend the book.
On a personal note, I stumbled onto this book when I was in middle school. Perhaps the content was a bit mature for me, but I will say that reading Sphere was one of the most memorable and impacting parts of my childhood. It was a real thriller for me, and the ending changed the way I think about the world. Consequently, Sphere was responsible for me discovering that I love to read. I honestly don’t think any of my assigned reading novels ever had the slightest chance of pulling me into literature like Sphere did.
I hope that with that knowledge, you can understand how I would recommend this book to just about anyone.
Jason
Jason, thanks for your comment.
I stand by my position that I would have chosen something more edifying. There is a difference between something that makes me a better person, more focused on God, and equipped for life and some acceptable or even interesting entertainment.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
I hope you realize that what chrighton was getting at with the sphere is kind of exactly what Jesus was probably getting at.
Also, using curse words is part of literature. It makes it feel real. When someone shouts a profanity, it expresses an almost mindlessness within the person, pure emotion.
Also if you read based on your guidelines you would never end up reading so much great literature that is out there just because you want to be sheltered from the real world! Please realize that this is a bad way to live and hiding doesn’t lead to happiness. Only full acceptance of all good and bad can lead to true peace and happiness.
Also Jesus doesn’t care if you curse, it’s all about intentions.
I also think that most people can handle this if they’re at least 12 or 13, though some of the nuances would be overlooked. I just finished it, I really didn’t see anything that controversial.
Read brave new world, that’ll blow your mind
Cates,
1) What do you think Jesus was probably getting at?
2) I believe that “filthy language out of your mouths” is displeasing to God and contrary to the purposes He established for His Church. In that this is in the Bible, I believe Jesus does care if I curse, and He cares that I pursue other more beneficial things with my speech, writing, and reading. So I would rather shelter myself from entertainment that employs “unfruitful works of darkness”. Humanity was not created for mindless emotion, but for heart, soul, mind, and strength submitted in love to our Creator. It is true that profanity and cursing are real occurrences. It is not necessary to use the words ourselves in order to communicate about what happened, nor to communicate strong and believable characters.
3) “Only full acceptance of all good and bad can lead to true peace and happiness.” This statement is contrary to Jesus. His message is to repent of bad, to be 100% good by His grace redeeming us and empowering us for obedience to His commands. We can have peace by receiving the sacrifice of Jesus on our behalf, so that our separating sins may be atoned, and we will be reconciled to (not at war anymore with) God. God is the source of joy.
5) I don’t believe in completely sheltering myself; I live in a world and am sent into the culture. I go with compassion for their wickedness that puts them at enmity with God; I don’t go to join in what damns them.
“Curse words are poor grammar, and lazy. Authors and speakers who must resort to profanity in order to communicate an emotion are to be pitied.”
Crichton was the king of the technothriller. Every fiction book he wrote had (for me ) the correct element of realism, fantasy and academic profficiency. He was also industrious in his research, ‘lazy’ is a word I could never use to describe him.
Crichton liked the idea of real people being caught in these tension filled environments , and……….believe it or not 99.9 percent of the population swear in everyday life , not including life threatening situations, using the lords name is actually considered a minor profanity in order to protect people from what they really think.The book would have stretched reality even more if upon seeing a giant squid norman had said ” oh my oh my a huge squid” .
Just came across this review, I realize it’s old. To me the standout character in this book in Beth, particularly because of the last 50 pages and particularly the last 2 pages. I’m not sure you picked up on it because it is very much worth mentioning…spoiler alert…the implication that she very likely did NOT give up the “power” by wishing it away?
I really don’t remember any implication like that. But I agree Beth is a strong character.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
I liked Sphere it has been a long time since I read the book but I watched the movie on netflix and started surfing for reviews and comments.
Your review is good I don’t share your concern that the book would be too much for for your average 6th grader but you know your audience better then I do.
I do have to take you to task over your comments about Biology. It has been a few years since you posted this so I hope you have taken the time to look in to Evolutionary Biology or at least have stopped posting about it. No Biologist that I know takes Panspermia (the theory that life developed some place else in the galaxy and was spread by comets or advanced aliens) seriously. There are very strong theories for the beginning of life on this planet and there has been plenty of time for life to develop along several different paths. Even starting over nearly from scratch a few times. The reason Biologists would love to get their hands on life from another plant maybe, Mars or Europa, is the life from somewhere else in our solar system would have totally different mechanisms. Studying life from other planets would not just be cool but it would provide unmatched incite into life on this planet. Look in to it, Dawkins’ resent book on the subject “The Greatest Show on Earth” is a great primer to modern Biology. Of course there are other books that go deeper into various subjects but Chris Mooney’s book “The Beak of the Finch” is a little technical but if you can grind out the first 50 or so pages it gets good and you can learn a good deal about where the science was 15 years ago or so.
Good Luck
BB
42 is the answer finding the question is the hard part.
My views have not changed on the creation of the world. The case for evolution is very unconvincing. In that it is mathematically impossible, not supported by evidence or laws of nature. Plus, there was a Witness of the whole thing; He cannot lie, and He says He made it, and formed it in 6 days. Dawkins, having rejected the only logical foundation for reason, is not one I consider an expert on rational thought or scientific investigation. See my review of The Ultimate Proof:
Thanks for reading.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
charles darwin was right i too am a christian but i believe in the principles of deism because i am also a firm believer in science. Deism means that you believe in God but after he created the universe he let it run according to its natural laws without His interference
Christians believe specifically that God is a God of transcendence, who visited the world with His power often, most notably through the incarnate Jesus Christ, who walked this earth being fully God, living a sinless life, doing miracles – the greatest of which was His resurrection. Deism and Darwinism have no place for the resurrection, the only hope for a Christian. A person becomes a Christian by calling on God to save him, through the shed blood of Jesus, to give him new spiritual life unending along with Jesus who was raised from the dead.
Christianity is belief in the one true God, who has revealed Himself truthfully in Scripture. If you are not believing the things the Bible says about Him, you are not putting your trust in the real God. Only the real God can save you from being punished for your sins. Made-up gods can’t hear or see or speak or save.
It’s a big deal. I encourage you to reconsider your deism.
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
Lisa,
Reading books means stretching your views, boundaries and experiences through this particular medium. If you don’t agree with the ideas presented on evolution etc. within the confines of the book, that doesn’t make the book bad, nor does it mean a recommendation should be withheld.
There may be some mild profanity etc. but this is also something that happens to be the way people talk. To be honest, in this particular realm, Sphere is pretty tame overall to many many other books. I actually think that Mr. Crichton used enough to convey the realism of the people involved and what they would say in a given situation. He didn’t go overboard and make these people a parody.
Like you I picked up Sphere at a second hand bookstore in 1995. I would have been in 8th grade at the time. I loved the book and it’s ideas and surprises. Since then I have read many of the author’s books and found nearly all of them wonderful reads.
As an apparently budding author yourself you can write about whatever you want. You can write religous themed books or stories and that is fine, but I implore you to expand your horizons when it comes to books. The more you read and the more wide-ranging in styles, themes, subject matter, etc. you absorb, the better writer you will become.
I have a Kindle with many many books on it. I’m currently reading Cormac McCarthy’s “The Road” which is a futuristic Dystopian thriller that is supposed to be one of the 100 greatest books of all-time. And I can honestly say that by what I have read so far it’s true. The realism presented in the book can be a bit tough to read at times, but it’s also a reflection of the reality of the situation the author is trying to present.
So the point is whether you a reading “The Road” or “Sphere”, you must understand that as an author you must stay true to your characters and how they will react. Sometimes that means writing about some things that are hard to read, but that also means you are never shortchanging yourself and your story for the sake of editing yourself and the content within your book.
“Sphere” is an excellent read. My book club will be reading it soon so I cannot wait. Until then I will be finishing “The Road” and moving onto “Atonement” and “A Million Little Pieces”.
Just remember that you don’t have to alter or change your religious views and it’s importance in your life to appreciate a good book. Even if that good book might have a few things that may be tough to read because well, your only reading about tough things that people say, do and have happen to them. That’s life.
Good luck, keep reading and writing and always expand yourself.
Mike
Michael,
Thank you for reading my blog and taking the time to respond.
My reply, as in the above comments, essentially is that my religious views, which you say need not be changed, admonish me to be careful and selective about how I spend my time and my thoughts. I am encouraged to think about things that are good, lovely, noble, pure, praiseworthy – and to not even flirt with things like filthy language and immorality. Philosophies that exalt themselves against the knowledge of God, like evolution/Darwinism, are to be taken captive to the obedience of Jesus Christ.
The Bible I read and follow acknowledges that these standards cause Christians to be distinct from other people. Here’s the reasoning: we all started out as people who lyingly say that filthy language and immorality are acceptable. But we have had our spiritual blindness taken away so that we can identify them as affronts to our Creator and Savior, who designed language and relationships with specific purposes. For these affronts, men and women who have not accepted God’s offer of forgiveness and restoration to Him are going to suffer God’s wrath for these imperfect words and practices. Why would I want to take lightly the cause of grief to my God and torment to my fellow man? The only reason anyone can be forgiven for these and other trespasses against God’s perfection is because Jesus Christ suffered death as my substitute. So I won’t celebrate those things for which He suffered either. I will avoid them. I will not recommend them.
My horizons do not need to be expanded deeper into wickedness in a fictional world that lies about the power of God in the midst of darkness. When facing evil in the real world (compare to ‘tough to read realism’), I walk in confidence that God is more powerful, that He helps and redeems those who call on Him in humble faith. For these things I advocate. That’s why my blog is all “To God be all glory.”
Indeed,
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
Reblogged this on Flying Tiger Comics and commented:
Sphere… I like the film better than the book now although when I first read the book as a child I thought it was pretty cool. Submarine psychologicals are a true genre or subgenre of their own- Frank Herbert’s “Under Pressure” and many more- but Sphere captures something else as well. Existential discombobulation. 🙂