Emergent Cloister – Emerging Church Nothing New
Idiosystematic, a critique of change in the Emerging Movement
John MacArthur on The Emergent Church
Evaluation of the “gospel” in Rob Bell’s Nooma videos in 3 parts. Part 1.
A long review of Rob Bell’s book, Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith
Doug Pagitt on whether Good Buddhists go to Heaven
Brian McLaren sounds like my brother’s Buddhist friend explaining John 14:6
Too many web pages open – and most of them are about the Emergent Church. Rob Bell and Nooma, Brian McLaren’s broad-way interpretation of John 14:6, and a variety of Christians warning other Christians about the subtle heresies of the Emergent authors and leaders. I have a lot more links about Rob Bell, and I think that’s because he’s more accepted by the people I know. He doesn’t push everyone into joining the Emergent Movement. But he’s a part, and basically he wants to infiltrate the existing Church with emerging theology – which is actually more philosophy, because God is a song in everyone’s heart.
McLaren, Pagitt, they say things that are extreme. The links I have up for them are not ones that say: when McLaren said this, he was wrong because… No. The links I have for them are from their own mouths or pens, self-explanatory in their heresy. Yes. Heresy. The Bible may not be all about who gets to heaven and who goes to hell, but it is about something; it’s about God, the God who so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Jesus is the center; not only His teachings or His compassion, but also His fulfillment of prophecy, His divine miracles, His judgment, His death, His resurrection, His ascension, His return. The Bible is about having a relationship with God, God dwelling with individuals, but it is about grace. God chooses. God pursues. God enables the relationship when we rebel and deserve to perish.
I read a McLaren page to my brother, and afterward I asked him, “Isn’t that horrible? That someone can teach that about John 14:6? I don’t understand how he can believe that.” My brother added that the sad thing is, McLaren had a lot of cool stuff to say mixed in with the bad theology.
Emergent books are like that. Especially the beginning is usually full of the enthusiastic, God-acknowledging, people-loving, truth-seeking community we’re looking for. And then, slowly at first, the authors begin to slip in their man-centered words, and then they talk about worship and evangelism. I wonder if the authors or editors intentionally include the controversial things in the latter halves of their books. My friends read these books very trustingly. Without being too critical, they think these books and teachers are just encouraging us to have a personal faith, to fulfill Jesus’ command to love.
But if I read closely, and look at other things these guys have said, I start to wonder… Faith in what? Who is the Jesus they say commanded love? What is worship? What gospel are we bringing to the world through our love and concern for social justice and community?
Rob Bell interprets Peter’s walk on water as faith (or little faith) in himself. The Jesus these guys mention omits mention of condemnation, hell, judgment, and sin. Their Jesus was an all-inclusive non-judgmental type. If we must acknowledge Jesus criticized some people, it was the favorite bad-guys, the hypocrites of Judaism, the exclusive and legalistic Pharisees. Good followers of Jesus would be the opposites of the Pharisees. Their gospel is some vague idea of the kingdom of God, a culture where people interact with God and love each other, all accomplished here on earth by Jesus’ trusted followers. Their gospel is joining God on His mission to make the world a better place.
They don’t talk about the gospel of life for the spiritually dead, or salvation for the sinners who have earned the eternal wrath of God. Without acknowledging our horrible guilt and God’s just right to wrath, we have no ability to understand His grace and His love and His sacrifice. Without acknowledging our total depravity, religion is not only not about the awesomeness of God; it inevitably plummets to being all about us.
Which is maybe why the emergent definition of worship is so disturbing. Worship to them is recognition of the spiritual. It can be expressed in more than music because candles are also spiritual, and painting is spiritual, and the beauty of nature is spiritual. To me, to the Bible, and to the English language, worship is recognition of the worth of its object. Yes; worship has an object, not in name only, but an inspiration. We don’t just sing praise songs because we feel like it, or because it’s a spiritual experience. Worship is not an experience; it’s an action. It either proclaims God’s glory or yields to it. We sing because God, about whom and to whom we sing, is worthy of it. Worship is more than music because our lives, sacrificed to His service and to His glory, can be a response to His wisdom and sacrifice and glory. God spoke light into the world, and created the nature we like to paint. He has done great things; therefore we will not keep silent. We will thank Him for His goodness toward us, marvel at His attention, proclaim His mighty works to the nations.
What worship should never be is about us. It should never be about recognizing the spirituality of a candle-lit room. Our songs cannot be about how much we love God, unless they are the overwhelmed effusions of people who cry on Jesus’ feet in gratitude. It isn’t about the art, or the environment, the sensation; worship is about the Almighty Creator of the universe who knows my name and who died for a wretch like me.
Rob Bell says in his Rhythm Nooma, “An infinite, massive, kind of invisible God—that’s hard to get our minds around. But truth, love, grace, mercy, justice, compassion…the way that Jesus lived. I can see that. I can understand that. I can relate to that. I can play that song!” But Isaiah said, “Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no searching of his understanding.” I relate to – and worship – a God who is bigger than me or my comprehension!
A month ago or more I watched Persuasion on PBS’s Jane Austen season, and commented that the best thing about the movie was that it made me want to re-read the book. The best thing about studying the Emergent Movement is that it makes me want the real thing, the solid truth against which I need no guards. I read the Bible to see what God really said, who Jesus really was, to find the passages where Jesus is the Savior, the Man of Sorrows, the Almighty God. And I get caught up again in the story. The story that has to do with my day, right now, but that casts me to my knees. I despised and rejected God. I betrayed and abused Him. And He loves me. He will never leave Me. He died for me. He gave me a beautiful day, and His pure Word. He enables me to teach about Him, and to coach my friends in study of His Word. Truth. His understanding is unsearchable, but whereto we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule, let us mind the same thing.
1 Corinthians 2:12-16, “Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.“
To God be all glory,
Lisa of Longbourn
Lisa of Longbourn 